Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
Best New Finds
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • AI News
    • Tech Tools
    • Health AI
    • Robotics
    • Privacy
    • Business
    • Creative AI
    • AI ABC's
    • Future AI
    • AI Marketing
    • Society
    • AI Ethics
    • Security
May 25.2025
2 Minutes Read

AI's Rising Energy Demand: Nearly Half of Datacentre Power Consumption?

AI could account for nearly half of datacentre power usage ‘by end of year’

AI's Growing Energy Appetite: What's at Stake?

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to develop and be integrated into various sectors, its impact on energy consumption is becoming a hot topic. Recent analysis suggests that AI could account for nearly half of datacentre power usage by the end of the year. This prediction raises important questions about sustainability and the future footprint of AI technology.

Understanding AI and Its Energy Demands

The intersection of AI and energy consumption is an intricate one. A study by Alex de Vries-Gao, published in Joule, underlines that AI technologies already consume a staggering 20% of the total energy used by datacentres, which collectively required about 415 terawatt hours (TWh) last year. Given that by the end of 2025 AI's energy consumption could rise to 49% of this total, we must question how these energy needs will be met. How do we balance innovation with sustainability?

The Cooling Crisis: More than Just Heat

Energy efficiency in datacentres is not solely about the hardware; it also involves substantial energy costs related to cooling systems. As AI workloads increase, the refrigeration systems required to keep them operational also consume significant electricity. This intricate relationship between AI demand and cooling shows us how dangerously intertwined technology advancements are with energy sustainability.

Future Predictions: Where Are We Headed?

Looking ahead, the demand for AI systems may compound energy use even further. Innovations aimed at lowering computational costs may also paradoxically encourage increased usage of AI technologies. This cyclical scenario, known as the efficiency paradox, poses a unique challenge for environmental and energy policy.

Global Implications: Geopolitical Factors

Geopolitical tensions could further complicate AI energy demands. With recent export controls affecting Chinese access to essential chips, companies are exploring alternative technologies, which can both alleviate and exacerbate energy concerns. The situation highlights how global relationships directly impact technological growth and their associated energy footprints.

Sustainable Innovations: Could They Be the Answer?

Despite the challenges, there is a silver lining. Innovative projects, such as Crusoe Energy’s gas-powered datacentre, indicate a move toward more sustainable solutions. These efforts, while still reliant on fossil fuels, represent a shift in thinking within tech companies, pushing towards greener alternatives in powering AI infrastructures. The challenge lies in how quickly and effectively these innovations can replace traditional energy sources.

In conclusion, as AI's energy requirements rise, understanding the implications for sustainability becomes crucial. A call for action exists within our society to push for cleaner energy sources that will ensure AI's future, enhancing its benefits while minimizing its environmental costs. Educating ourselves on AI fundamentals and energy impacts must be a collective effort if we desire a more sustainable technological landscape moving forward.

Society

1 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
10.13.2025

Why the AI Homeless Man Prank is a Dangerous Trend for Teens

Update The AI Homeless Man Prank: A Dangerous New Trend In today's digital age, where social media pranks can quickly go viral, one trend has captured the attention—and concern—of law enforcement around the globe: the AI homeless man prank. This prank, which originated on platforms like TikTok and Snapchat, involves using artificial intelligence (AI) to create realistic images of a disheveled man appearing inside someone’s home. The intention is to trick unsuspecting parents or guardians, which has led to a series of alarming incidents and police responses. How the Prank Works Teenagers are taking advantage of AI image generators to create hyper-realistic photos that depict a homeless man lounging on a couch, eating food, or sleeping in a bed. They then send these images to their family members, often claiming that this stranger has entered their home and that they are simply being hospitable. This prank, however, can easily escalate; parents fearful for their children’s safety frequently dial emergency services, believing a genuine home invasion is underway. The Backlash from Law Enforcement Police departments across multiple countries are issuing warnings about the potential dangers of this trend. In jurisdictions like Round Rock, Texas, and Salem, Massachusetts, police have stated that such pranks waste valuable emergency resources and can result in serious law enforcement responses, including SWAT teams. Commander Andy McKinney from the Round Rock Police Department noted that calls regarding supposed home invasions involving children are treated as high priorities, meaning that pranksters could inadvertently put themselves in dangerous situations. Why This Matters Beyond mere chaos, the AI homeless man prank raises significant ethical questions. For one, it dehumanizes homeless individuals and trivializes the serious issue of homelessness in society. Furthermore, as artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the implications for privacy and personal safety become increasingly pronounced. Discussions surrounding responsible AI use, the challenges in AI ethics, and its potential repercussions on human rights are more pertinent than ever. Encouraging Responsible Tech Use As families engage with technology, teaching responsible usage is essential. The Round Rock Police Department emphasizes the importance of conversations between parents and children regarding the consequences of such pranks—knowingly filing false reports can carry severe penalties, including criminal charges. It’s a reminder that while technology can enable creativity, it also necessitates accountability. Moving Forward: Community Togetherness Against Prank Culture While social media can foster creativity and connection, it’s vital to approach trends that may cause harm or distress with caution. As this prank continues to circulate, community discussions about ethical conduct online could not be more important. Open dialogues about the responsible use of AI tools, as well as fostering empathy towards vulnerable populations, can ultimately contribute to a safer digital landscape for everyone. In conclusion, the AI homeless man prank serves as a stark reminder of the fine line between humor and harm in our increasingly connected world. Let’s strive for responsible tech use, keeping in mind the real-world implications of our online actions.

10.08.2025

Google Cuts Off Internet for AI Development: Is It a Necessary Sacrifice?

Update Understanding Google’s Controversial AI Strategy In an unprecedented move, Google has effectively restricted internet access for a substantial portion of its operations by implementing a pilot program that could cut off 90% of the internet from AI development. This initiative arises in the context of heightened cybersecurity threats faced by tech employees, who are increasingly targeted due to their access to sensitive data and systems. As Google rolls out an array of new AI tools, ensuring the safety of both their infrastructure and user data has never been more critical. Why Limit Access? The decision to restrict internet access stems from a pressing need to combat cyberattacks. Google’s internal memo indicates that employees are prime targets for malicious attacks, and limiting internet access on select desktops is viewed as a necessary measure to protect critical information from potential breaches. While the restrictive approach may sound extreme, it highlights the dichotomy of operating in a hyper-connected world while also safeguarding against its vulnerabilities. The Implications for AI Development By cutting off vast swathes of the internet, Google aims to mitigate risks associated with storing AI data and maintaining the integrity of their models. The tech giant's commitment to artificial intelligence seems at odds with their recent actions, leaving many wondering how this policy will affect innovation in AI technologies. Reduced internet access could impede the utilization of valuable AI applications and prevent engineers from leveraging external tools, resources, and datasets that are vital for fostering innovation. Future Trends and Predictions This move may also set a precedent for other tech firms as they confront cybersecurity challenges. The need for robust cybersecurity protocols is clear, and as we continue to navigate the intersection of technology and safety, this example could become a reference point for future AI implementations across industries. As the landscape of AI continues to evolve, the conversation about ethical AI development and its societal implications must remain at the forefront. What’s at Stake? The evolution of artificial intelligence hinges not only on technological advances but also on the frameworks within which these innovations are developed. From healthcare to business operations, the capability and efficiency improvements tied to AI are undeniable. Thus, understanding how such cybersecurity measures impact AI applications and the broader implications for job roles, industry standards, and user privacy is essential. As curiosity and concern about artificial intelligence grow, it’s crucial for stakeholders—students, professionals, and tech enthusiasts—to stay informed about developments like these. Understanding how companies like Google navigate this landscape can equip us with insights that influence how we all engage with technology. For those interested in the future of technology, it’s essential to keep pace with these discussions. As AI innovations unfold, being part of the conversation on how such measures affect AI and cybersecurity could lead to better protection and innovative breakthroughs in the field.

10.10.2025

Why Activists Are Watching Their Backs: The Future of Political Dissent in a Surveillance State

Update The Inequitable Targeting of Activists in the U.S.The recent experiences of Amandla Thomas-Johnson, a foreign Black pro-Palestinian activist, illustrate a broader, troubling trend in U.S. immigration and surveillance practices. Having planned to contribute to a constructive academic and journalistic discourse, the sudden shift to being an object of scrutiny highlights the precarious balance of political expression and governmental oversight.The Dark Intersection of Surveillance and Political DissentAfter attending a protest against corporations involved in arms supply to Israel, Thomas-Johnson faced immediate repercussions, barring her from her university and prompting fears of deportation. This situation isn't isolated; it paves the way for a culture of fear among activists. Indeed, various reports, including those from GBH, reveal heightened surveillance on pro-Palestinian activists in places like Massachusetts, where groups leverage AI tools to document and combat dissent. This echoes historical episodes of surveillance against marginalized groups, which prioritize control over justice and equity.Repercussions of Surveillance on Civil LibertiesThe chilling effects of targeted surveillance extend beyond mere monitoring. The narratives shared by students such as those from Boston highlight how fear diminishes the vibrancy of campus activism. Public political engagement now carries a risk of permanent damage not only to one’s educational standing but also to personal safety. As echoing sentiments from the American Civil Liberties Union illustrate, such tactics threaten the fundamental rights guaranteed to every American.Unequal Application of Surveillance StandardsInterestingly, the focus remains disproportionately on activists from minority backgrounds, drawing parallels to past government actions historically justified under the umbrella of national security. As activists expressing dissenting opinions are painted as ‘threats,’ the vital distinction of protected political speech becomes clouded. This disruption echoes former practices like COINTELPRO that targeted civil rights leaders, suggesting an enduring legacy of surveillance that stifles dissent under the guise of security.Future Actions and CountermeasuresThis unsettling blend of heightened surveillance and diminished civil liberties in the name of national security obliges the public to advocate for transparency and accountability from both governmental bodies and organizations utilizing technology in this context. Educational institutions can play a critical role in creating inclusive environments where students can freely express dissent without the fear of surveillance or reprisal. Activists, allies, and human rights organizations must rise together to challenge the oppressive systems that seek to stifle freedom of expression.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*